Chris Silver Smith seen how Google has up to date its Google Maps contributed content material coverage and eliminated a line that prohibited review-gating. The road that was eliminated was “do not discourage or prohibit adverse opinions or selectively solicit optimistic opinions from prospects.”
Chris posted on Twitter saying “It seems Google has eliminated its coverage that particularly banned review-gating. Evaluate the Dec ’21 copy of the coverage (proper) with present (left).” Right here share this screenshot of the insurance policies:
It seems Google has eliminated its coverage that particularly banned review-gating. Evaluate the Dec ’21 copy of the coverage (proper) with present (left).
Maybe Google felt review-gating qualifies as unlawful, after the FTC fined Style Nova, so the precise rule is now superfluous? pic.twitter.com/aIIEdqa0Gy
— Chris Silver Smith (@si1very) August 22, 2022
In January, the @FTC fined Style Nova for review-gating, so, it might be that Google considers this to be lined by its guidelines in opposition to unlawful content material. See: https://t.co/vyEv9WOjRN
— Chris Silver Smith (@si1very) August 22, 2022
Mike Blumenthal did clarify that some insurance policies have been moved, however this was ignored:
I had diligently regarded via that, and can’t discover equal language about “discouraging or prohibiting adverse opinions”. I can see the phrase “discouraging” as being doubtlessly too obscure. They probably want one thing extra particular to spell out review-gating schemes.
— Chris Silver Smith (@si1very) August 22, 2022
So I requested Google about this and Google defined the pretend engagement coverage does write “Contributions to Google Maps ought to mirror a real expertise at a spot or enterprise. Pretend engagement is just not allowed and can be eliminated.”
The coverage notes that this contains:
- Paying, incentivizing or encouraging the posting of content material that doesn’t characterize a real expertise.
- Content material that’s not primarily based on an actual expertise and doesn’t precisely characterize the situation or product in query.
- Content material that has been incentivized by a enterprise in trade for reductions, free items and/or companies.
- Content material that has been posted by a competitor to undermine a enterprise or product’s repute.
- Content material that has been posted from a number of accounts to control a spot’s ranking.
Discussion board dialogue at Twitter.
