Two bubble speak or remark signal image on blue background. 3d render.
Typically, you want a reminder about why a bit of expertise is so helpful.
After writing what was basically an obituary about Twitter, I got here throughout a management podcast with the well-known pastor and management professional Andy Stanley.
Actually, it made me like Twitter a bit of bit extra.
He was chatting with one other well-known luminary within the management house named John Maxwell. These guys know what they’re speaking about and are gifted communicators and guide authors. All the chat is on YouTube proper right here:
It was a passing remark about Twitter that caught my consideration.
Andy Stanley not too long ago wrote a guide about division and battle, and he talked about how he makes use of Twitter to do a few of his analysis. He understands some individuals don’t like Twitter, however he’s a fan. “I really like Twitter, I comply with all types of individuals,” he mentioned.
Stanley went on to elucidate a remark he learn on Twitter and the way it impacted his writing and thought course of. The tweet he discovered had a nuance and an articulate expression that impressed him. “Issues may be solved the place there is usually a dialog with nuance,” he mentioned a bit later within the episode.
That final remark floored me. Wait, is he actually speaking about Twitter? The Twitter I like to hate? Sure, and that’s the nice hope with the platform, particularly as we enter a brand new time period when Elon Musk is likely to be truly buying the platform, and as we launch into a brand new political season within the coming weeks.
It additionally jogs my memory of considered one of my favourite quotes about social media, from the director and producer J.J. Abrams: “We stay in a second the place all the pieces instantly appears to default to outrage,” Abrams informed EW.com not way back. “There’s an M.O. the place ‘it’s both precisely as I see it otherwise you’re my enemy’. It’s a loopy factor that there’s such a norm that appears to be devoid of nuance and compassion….we knew each resolution we made would please somebody and infuriate another person.”
I like that abstract. It means Twitter has two choices.
One is to permit nuanced discussions, to offer salient info and good analysis to assist management specialists like Andy Stanley and guide authors like John Maxwell. The opposite is to let nuance result in fixed debate, the splitting of hairs over the positive factors of any and each subject beneath the solar. Nuance is definitely a constructive phrase. It occurs once we discover the nuance of music, or an awesome speech, or a creative expression. Nuance means there’s a subtlety of excellence and you need to search for it fastidiously.
Stanley was hinting at one of many nice advantages of utilizing Twitter.
You will discover the nuance; it does exist. You possibly can uncover some superb truths, even with the character limits in place. I’ve seen numerous pithy statements, quick expressions of brilliance, and humorous (and nuanced) jokes. I hate to confess it in public, however I really like these BuzzFeed round-ups of the most effective Twitter jokes. They’re hilarious.
I hope that by no means modifications. The opposite form of nuance results in splitting hairs and fixed pointless debate. The sky is blue, however probably not. Minor discrepancies are operating rampant and spoil the complete expertise. It appears to depend upon who’s tweeting and who’s studying the tweets. Everybody loses once we solely cut up hairs.
For now, each nuances exist. The constructive sort exists, these golden nuggets that may assist guide authors categorical in only some phrases one thing that may change your life. The opposite nuance is competing for our consideration, championed by trolls.
Whether or not Twitter even survives depends upon which nuance wins out.
